Debbie

The nuances of Love Compatibility

2008-11-17T08:20:00.005+08:00

Who ever said that two people must be compatible in every way possible before a marriage can work out?

There are marriages I've seen work out though both individuals are very different. To me, the key in making marriages work is dictated by the three C's: Communication, Comprimise and Concern.

On a forum aired on Channel News Asia about more than one month back, Editor Nichloas Fang once said that guys may be put off by ladies because they always strike to be scrutinizing every guy they date (especially on the first date), and making mental ticks on the checklist.

It is common for ladies to have an ideal husband they would like to have, and eventually comes the characteristics associated with that. Sometimes the list seems to be inexhaustible. A study once revealed that the characteristics one looks for in a life partner tend to be closely associated with the image of one's father.

Even though many ladies claim that they only hope their partner treats them well, and is caring and helpful, believe me, there's so much more to that list that may just grow longer each day. More often than not, the partners ladies choose have apparently met made many other ticks than just the three mentioned earlier - though some characteristics are ingrained subconsciously in them.

Here's an example of a typical checklist:

1. Image -

When they say "Image is everything", BELIEVE it! The first 10-20 secs is all she needs to sum you up, and decide if you're thrown into the 'Potential' list or the Cold Palace.

2. Confidence -

Guys are said to like ladies who exude confidence which makes them unbearably attractive. Well, the same applies to ladies. Many friends revealed that they like guys who look confident and comfortable in their skin - their stide, the way they talk and present themselves - and the eye contact. One of my friend once told me that she like guys whose eyes sparkle - well, apparently to her.

3. Family background -

As much as you want to insist that you're the one dating her and not your family, but ladies do care about your family background.

4. Religion -

Yes to some, and no to others. It's pretty subjective.

5. Character -

Yes, the inside counts - but they will only be able to see that after a period of time. You got to pass the first test - Your image!

Hence, as the checklist is designed based on one's educational, economical, societal status, character and other what-not intricate details, one have a higher tendancy of eventually settling for a life partner who's highly compatible.

But hey, opposites attract right? Who's to say 'I'm not supposed to fall in love with him/her?'.

However, people of the past tend to be oblivious to this fact by coming up with a brilliant idea called "Arranged Marriage".

I have heard of people who submitted to their parents' orders and married someone they have only first met on their marriage day. Some made the marriage work, and revealed that they eventually fell in love with their husbands. Some marriages failed.

But do not be surprised, as arranged marriages are still practiced in today's modern society, encrusted in several nooks and corners of the earth so rooted that it may take several decades down for it to slowly bid goodbye to this world.

Arranged marriages remains in practice in Singapore's Indian society, as revealed by Channel News Asia Get Rea! programme. The rules are slightly laxed thought, as compared to the past. Now, the couples paired up are allowed to meet in a public place to chat and see if the partner picked out suits him or her. If yes, wedding plans will kick into action. If no, another partner will be picked again.

Tell that to the youths and adults of today, and they'll probably rubbish the idea right in your face. Force them? There'll not be any runaway brides, don't worry, because they will run away immediately - not on the wedding day.

But there are some who voluntarily opt for arranged marriages as they strongly believe in being compatible in level of education, income level and societal status as their partner. Such is in the case of Jasmit Johal, who found her Mr. Right through a matrimonial website (www.shaadi.com) where applicants can filter matches from job type and income right down to the the desired height and car they own. She revealed that she had a very pleasant meeting as he was everything she'd hoped for.

Is arranged marriage for you? You decide.

The Ultimate O Team

2008-11-07T09:41:00.004+08:00

An uphill task for Mr. Obama ahead

With the initial euphoria of Mr. Obama's victory on 5th Nov, Wednesday, gradually fading away, bowing to glooming fears of recession, what lies ahead for Americans remains bleak and uncertain.

The top of the agenda for Mr. Obama is to address the economic downturn sparked off by the rising morgage prices and further fuelled by the the collapse of Lehman Brothers, American Insurance giant AIG and the acquisition of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the US government, propelling the rate of global recession even faster.

All eyes are now on who Mr. Obama will be picking for his dream team. Names of his cabinet have already been circulating, and it is said that both new and old blood will be amalgamted to "reflect the country's political, geographical and racial diversity", according to Mr. Darrell West, Director of Governance Studies at Brookings Institution. Republicans are also speculated to bag several top positions.

Mr. Rahm Emanual, former Clinton advisor, has been knighted White House Chief of Staff. Mr. Emanual has been known to be tough and is held in high regard by Democrats when he aided the party's return to power in the 2006 congressional elections.

Key appointments such as the Treasury and Homeland Security would be released to the media within a day to display Mr. Obama's dedication to be on top of the situation in a time of crisis.

The most likely candidate for the Treasury job is Mr. Lawrence Summers, 53, a Harvard University economist who served former president Mr. Bill Clinton as the same post. Other picks include Mr. Timothy Geithner, Head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and Mr. Paul Volcker, former Federal Reserve Chairman.

Mr. John Podesta, Clinton's Chief of Staff, Mr. Pete Rouse, Mr. Obama's chief of staff in Senate and Ms. Valerie Jarrett, a long-time friend and campaign adviser, will be heading the team to headhunt for the dream team.

The Secretary of State position forerunner is Mr. John Kerry, a Massachusetts Senator who gave Mr. Obama a major political break by offering him a prime speaking slot during the 2004 party convention. However, Mr. Obama also has a choice of tapping into the Republicans with Mr. Richard Helbrooke of Indiana or Mr. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska.

Denfence Secretary Robert Gates may be asked to stay in the post. Other names includes former deputy defence secretary John Hamre, former navy secretary Richard Danzig and General Colin Powell.

Other positions include:

Commerce Secretary
Ms. Penny Pritzker, Chicago tycoon and Mr. Obama's national finance chairman

Secretary of Health and Human Services
Mr. Howard Dean, a Democratic National Committee Chairman and doctor

Head of Environmental Protection Agency
Mr. Robert F. Kennedy

Who Mr. Obama has accosted to remains unclear. Amidst the watchful eyes of Americans, Mr. Obama received his first presidential-style intelligence briefing in Chicago.

Besides the task of forming and crystallizing his new team, Mr. Obama is also burdened with the task of establishing talks and bringing diplomatic ties primarily between China, South Korea, Taiwan and Pakistan to a higher plane.

Most importantly, Mr. Obama has to deliver what he promised during the elections: Affordable healthcare for the bourgeosies, pull back of the Iraq troops, tax raises and measures to bring the economy back on rail in such abysmal outlook.

"Taking office at a time of crisi doesn't guarantee greatness, but it can be an occasion for it," said Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel.

Obama wins Presidency

2008-11-05T19:11:00.005+08:00

America saw

CHANGE

Today.

Click here for the full story.

Reform Singapore

2008-10-08T15:21:00.012+08:00

Talk about Democracy.

Almost a month after the rules governing the Speaker's Corner are laxed since September 1 - with speakers being able to hold talks without registering with the police, a 24-hour flexibilty, the circle being opened to permanent residents, and being able to touch on sensitive issues such as race and religion allowed - why is it that the participation level at the Speaker's Corner is so low? Or rather, lower than I expected, to say the least.

The root is easily found: Singaporeans are too obedient.

Blame it on our education and culture. We have been brought up in a stimulated culture and a certain way of upbringing that tells us "No, don't do this, because it is not right.", or "Stop! You must do this." Since young, we have been nurtured to do all the "right" things. And by "right", the definition stems from the government who monitors the society with a tool called Legislation.

Yes, rules and regulations are essential in maintaining peace and stability in the country - and Singapore government have done a fine job at that. Look at our growing economy, budget surpluses and peaceful society. I am glad to be living in Singapore.

However, if our education system, being ranked one of the best in the world, actually serves to promote foundational knowledge and life skills like competition being evident in every corner of the classroom, but yet stifle our boldness, creativity and critical thinking, is it all that beneficial?

I had an extremely engaging conversation with my friend. We spoke about Singapore's policies and what changes are encouraged to stratigically position Singapore to grab a bigger global pie. Believe me, this is the most interesting conversation I've had so far.

Q: So, what do u think needed to be changed in the current Singapore system?

A: The government needs to downsize (on its degree of control) as there is too much intervention.

We subscribe to effing corporatism. This nation is run like a large company. (My friend added that this is the reason why there is less bona fide belonging observed in Singapore).

Q: So, if you were President, what is the first thing you would do - be it policy implementation or changes in the reform?

A: Education is the first thing I would address. A good deal of what society develops to become stems from the quality of education. The reason why our society is so rigid in thought and low on passion is because of the way we were taught in school.

She continued to talk about how she taught in schools.

Her class rules:

"Iin my class, you may swear, wear whatever you please, style your hair in such a way that it takes attention away from your faces, challenge my ideas, and be yourselves completely. Just don't touch me."

You may not agree with everything entirely, but this method has proved to close the generational gap between teachers and students. Many of the students actually regard my friend as their friend, a person to seek for advices. And this is what we want to achieve - definitely not through scolding.

Countless times I have asked people to tell me one teacher that has inspired them, and I always find myself staring into a blank face. Their answer? A flat "none" - without a hint of hesitation. How many teachers truly inspire?

Then its a whole different story when I talk to my overseas pal. They enjoy school, they enjoy life, they are creative, and most importantly, they DARE to speak up.

Singapore has been encouraging entrepreneuship in our country to continue our economic growth and to have an edge over the global economy. My advise: Revise the curriculum.

Yes, they have recognised the importance of education. The government have put in place measures such as eradicating barriers of entry for Small-medium Enterprises (SMEs) and making bank loans easier, as well as organising competitions at school levels pertaining to entreprenuership. I remember going through the excitment of setting up my own business from scratch. But sad to say, it is different in the real world. And I do not wish to say this, but Singaporean students are acutely aware of this fact.

Ultimately, the best way is to change the way we are taught, inculcate more lessons outside of classrooms. There is so much more than can be done.

Food for thought!

Note: All confidentiality of any names is observed.

Sex-y Battle

2008-10-08T07:53:00.005+08:00

The Media shapes the society in ways more than you ever imagined.

Define "sexy".

The intricate nuances of boy-girl sexual attraction has long been present since the day Adam set his eyes on Eve. However, have you ever thought, what is it in Eve that appeared pleasent to Adam? What is "pleasant"?

As the sex-y battle unfolds, you will find yourself tangled in a tug-of-war over the debacle: Is this Sexy or not? The media has been an integral part of our lives; whethere you like it or not. It has a strong influence on our ideology, behaviour and actions that served to mould the society into what it is today.

The mere notion of characterizing people as "weird" or "sexy" - the definition of these words is ultimately media-crafted. Ever thought your own definition of the words you use?

The use of words are accepted without resistence as the norm of society. Let's take a look at some fine examples:

When ladies wear tight skinny jeans, they are considered "hot" and earns many stares from goggling men and envious women. But when men wear tight jeans, they will earn stares, sure, but mostly from people who either classify them as gay or think they are "gross", as many of my friends plainly put it.

When ladies adorn themselves with earrings and accessories, they earn praises from fellow friends or colleagues saying they look "pretty" and "gorgeous". However, when men decorate themselves with earrings with holes unimaginably big and chains hanging down from their neck, there are divided opinions. Some innocent teens will think they look "cool". Others just think they "act cool"- and along with that remark comes the sentiment of disgust.

When ladies wear spaghetti strips and mini skirts, the men will literally drool as their eyes are loving the feast. When men wear sleeveless top with short pants, again comes divided opinions - one of preferance that guys put on proper shirts, or one that accepts them for their own taste. Someone once told me, "If that guy is muscular, I don't mind. But if that guy is fat and short, it'll look so ugly. He'd be better off putting on a shirt with sleeves."

How about women who go bikini waxing? They are often deemed as acceptable and thought as girls who care about their own appearance and body. Fabulous. But how about men going for bikini waxing? Ever wondered why some guys look great while sun tanning? It's no I'm-born-like-that theory. They take care of themselves, just like girls do. However, why does the same action by men earn scrunched up faces and disgusted looks from people who hear of it? My friend once asked me what I thought of him if he went for waxing. I told him that the decision ultimately lies with him, but it would definitely be an experience. These people know how the world thinks of them, but they just want to experience it out of curiosity. Is that wrong?

Essentially, the light under which we see people and attach them to a character largely boils down to an individual's ideology. The reason why people can relate to the same term used is due to a similar media influence that results in a homogenious society.

But what if, just what if, we redefine beauty and the characteristics it embodies?

Today, learn to look at everything in a different angle - and be prepared for your world to be turned topsy-turvy!

Before you comment, look inside the person - Real Beauty is found from within.

Redefine "sexy".

Legalise Gay Sex: Yes or No?

2008-09-14T20:07:00.005+08:00

Should Singapore endorse gay sex - or as put by Mr. Ho Kwon Ping, "decriminalise" gay sex?

The rise of gays and lesbians could probably be attributed to the birth of a more liberal society, as prominently observed in the West.

People are beginning to explore arenas never once thought of by the ancient conservative Stone Age humans. In ancient China, the staunch belief of everyone - men and women alike - is that women are born to serve men. A women's duties are to the household - to cook, wash, look after the children, and of course the most important of all, to carry on the family name. Every men's duties are to work and be a financial provider of the family. Everyone conformed to that ideology, simply because they were all brought up and instilled with these values since young.

There were no TVs or western influences that could penetrate as deeply into the society now than compared to the past. Hence, the Chinese were not affected, to say the least, by external influences.

Then came the period were everyone said goodbye to their pigtails and embraced a slightly more liberal society. But still, these ideologies were adhered to.

Slowly, external influences were brought about by the increasing number of TV sets and computers due to the country's affluence. This is when the big change starts taking place, moulding to society and teens largely based on what they see online or no TV screens.

Eventually, here we are today - where sex is an essential and integral part of a relationship (whether you are married or not. In the past, a couple can only consumate after marriage. People who are pregnant before marriage are deemed as black sheeps, and in some part of China, are stoned to death, literally.), when we rely more on Internet then ever, an era where our beliefs are constantly changing, dictated by Hollywood stars like Miley Cyrus, Linsay Lohan, Britney Spears and whoever else.

The advancement of technology had also aided in speeding up this process. Today, if you're unhappy about your own sex, no problem, just visit the doctor to do a transexual operation. The only deterring factor is probably money.

What sparked me to write such an article is after reading an article written by Mr. Ho Kwon Ping, which was published in TODAY on Sept 8th.

Click here to read more about Mr. Ho's article.

Personally, I do agree with Mr. Ho's views on gay sex, but only to a small extent.

#1: Gays are tolerated, not accepted.

Mr. Ho argued that there is a significant difference in gays being merely "tolerated because gays are seen to be at the leading edge of the "creative class" ... and being accepted..", which I agree. Gays are fundamentally humans, or in scientific terms 'homo sapiens'. They deserve the same respect and dignity that every other individual deserves.

In its Declaration on the Principles of Tolerance, UNESCO offers a definition of tolerance that most closely matches our philosophical use of the word:

Tolerance is respect, acceptance and appreciation of the rich diversity of our world's cultures, our forms of expression and ways of being human. Tolerance is harmony in difference. - http://www.tolerance.org/about/tolerance.html

Another definition of TOLERANCE (n.):

The capacity for or the practice of recognizing and respecting the beliefs or practices of others. -http://www.thefreedictionary.com/tolerance

The definition of Acceptance, on the other hand, though encompassing almost simliar meaning to that of "tolerance", is distinctly different.

ACCEPTANCE:

1. The act or process of accepting.
2. The state of being accepted or acceptable.
3. Favorable reception; approval.
4. Belief in something; agreement.

-http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Acceptance

The main essence carried in the word "acceptance", which draws a line from "tolerance" is the word "favourable". It carries nuances of emotions which are good, or shed a good light on whatever people have come to consensus with.

Hence, "tolerance" is not tantamount to "acceptance".

Therefore, I have successfully proven that these 2 terms are distinct, yet simliar in some ways. However, do note that I did not express that I agree to the legalising of gay sex.

#2: Decriminalise Gay Sex In Singapore

Secondly, Mr. Ho argued that since many countries have "decriminalised' (in Mr. Ho's terms) gay sex, and had even allowed or celebrated gay marriages across the globe, Singapore should do the same too.

He pointed out that "Singapore is known to be economically liberal, but socially conservative."

Below are some sources I've found to state Singapore's current stand on the matter:

In an article published in Oct 24, 2007:

"Singapore has legalised oral and anal sex between heterosexual couples, but retained a law which criminalises intercourse between gay men.

In the city-state's first major penal code amendments in 22 years, parliament repealed a section criminalising "carnal intercourse against the order of nature".

Parliament however kept the penal code's section 377A, which makes sex between men a criminal offence, rejecting a petition by gay rights activists and their non-homosexual supporters to abolish the law as well."

- http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/singapore-relaxes-sex-laws-but-not-for-gay-men/2007/10/24/1192941098463.html

History of Gay in Singapore:

When the Japanese invaded Singapore in February 1942, Japanese laws replaced previous colonial laws. Gay sex was never criminalised in Japan and would now have been technically legal in Singapore. However, given the lack of human rights and rule of law under the Japanese occupation, this change in law was a technical and historical quirk, reflective of a different legal tradition, rather than an expansion of real rights for gay people.

Anecdotally, gay cruising continued in post-war Singapore in back alleys, public parks and toilets. In the most part, this was ignored by the police and no one was charged under section 377 of the Singapore Penal Code.

Did You Know?

Homosexuality and transsexuality were listed as conditions in a Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) 'Directory of Diseases' (disease code 302).

Source: Wikipedia -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore_gay_history

Yes, I agree that many countries are legalising gay sex in their legislations. Among them are countries such as Jerusalem, Japan and most evidently seen in European nations.

JERUSALEM:

January 16,2004

The Jewish Community Relations Council, the major public policy voice of the Jewish community in Greater Boston, has voted overwhelmingly to endorse same-sex marriage.

Several Jewish organizations had already endorsed same-sex marriage, including the largest Jewish denomination in the country, the Union for Reform Judaism, and the Northeast region of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, the association of Reform rabbis that voted unanimously this week to support same-sex marriage. But same-sex marriage is opposed by leaders of Orthodox Judaism, a denomination that makes up a small minority of Greater Boston's 250,000-member Jewish community. The board of trustees of the Jewish Community Relations Council, made up of Jewish religious and social service organizations and prominent Jewish individuals, on Wednesday night voted 51-5 in favor of the resolution endorsing same-sex marriage. -http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2004/01/16/jewish_group_oks_same_sex_marriage/

Many gays commerate or celebrate their decision with thousands other gays alike in an annual event called the World Pride. World Pride is an international gathering of homosexual, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered individuals scheduled in Jerusalem in August. World Pride is a 10-day festival planned meticulously by gay leaders worldwide.

The Mission Statement for WorldPride 2006 is clear: “Jerusalem WorldPride will come to Jerusalem. Jerusalem WorldPride 2006 will bring a new focus to an ancient city through a massive demonstration of [Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender] dignity, pride, and boundary-crossing celebration...from the home of the world’s three great religions; we will proclaim that love knows no borders.”

JAPAN:

Unlike in Muslim countries, homosexuality is legal in Japan. Male prostitution is unregulated by the law and Tokyo bans anti-gay job firings. As a primarily Buddhist and Shinto nation, there's very little in the way of religious discrimination. There's also no shame attacted to depicting same-sex love in books, comics, and television.

NETHERLANDS:

They saw their first gay-marriage in 2001.

Around the world, countries are coming to terms with how to treat homosexual couples - and the trend in many is toward liberalizing laws. In Denmark, civil unions with the same rights as marriage have been around since 1989, and other Nordic countries followed suit in the 1990s.

The Dutch were the first to eliminate any distinction between gay and straight, striking all references to gender in the marriage laws. Belgium soon did the same. Canada jumped to the forefront of gay rights in North America in June when it announced plans to legalize same-sex marriages.

Many same-sex couples streamed north to marry in Ottawa and British Columbia after courts in those provinces authorized weddings.

In most of Africa, homosexuality is illegal and gay marriage unthinkable. But in South Africa, gay rights were enshrined in the post-apartheid constitution and some groups are lobbying for the right to marry. -http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/04/world/main604084.shtml

Here is the legal status of gay marriage in Europe and other parts of the world:

Belgium: Legalized gay marriage in 2002.

Britain: Plans to introduce legislation soon authorizing civil unions giving gay couples legal recognition with most of the rights enjoyed by married partners.

Canada: Considering legislation to legalize gay marriage.

Denmark: The first country to legalize same-sex unions in 1989, later giving couples adoption rights. Other Nordic countries followed in the 1990s.

France: Allows civil unions since 2000.

Germany: Introduced civil unions in 2001.

Italy: Does not recognize same-sex unions.

The Netherlands: Became the first country to legalize gay marriages outright in 2001.

Portugal: Lesbian and gay couples who live together acquire the same rights as heterosexuals in common-law marriages.

Spain: Like most Roman Catholic countries, Spain does not recognize gay unions. But some northern regions, such as Navarra and the Basque country, recognize gay common-law couples and accord them rights of spouses.

South Africa: Recognized gay rights in its constitution after apartheid ended in 1994. Activists are preparing litigation to have the common law definition of marriage extended to include same-sex couples.

Switzerland: Its largest city, Zurich, started recognizing registered gay couples last July. Geneva also recognizes same-sex couples, although grants them fewer rights. Swiauthorities are considering whether to introduce a national law to harmonize treatment throughout the country.

Source: AP

However, I beg to differ pertaining to Mr. Ho's call for Singapore to legalise gay sex.

And there are signs that the world has yet to come to terms with the notion totally.

Let me prove it to you.

JERUSALEM:

The religious leaders, Sheik Abed es-Salem Menasra, deputy mufti of Jerusalem; Rev. Michel Sabbagh, Latin patriarch; Rev. Aris Shirvanian, Armenian patriarch; Rabbi Shlomo Amar, Sephardic chief rabbi, and Rabbi Yona Metzger, Ashkenazi chief rabbi expressed their concern that the festival (World Pride) would desecrate the holy city and communicate the mistaken impression that homosexuality is acceptable.

Shlomo Amar said, “They are creating a deep and terrible sorrow that is unbearable. It hurts all of the religions. We are all against it.”

Dr. Michael Evans said,"..you can be certain that WorldPride’s gay pastors will proclaim to the citizens of Jerusalem that the homosexual populace is wonderful Christians who represent you and me. If it happens every Jew worldwide will see this sight, as well as the one billion Muslims. All will think that is who we are and what we represent."

USA:

Feburary 25, 2004

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush endorsed a constitutional amendment Tuesday that would restrict marriage to two people of the opposite sex but leave open the possibility that states could allow civil unions.

"The union of a man and a woman is the most enduring human institution, honored and encouraged in all cultures and by every religious faith," Bush said.

June 27, 2008

SAN FRANCISCO—After several weeks of silence on the issue of same-sex marriage, Sen. John McCain has made it official. The presumptive Republican nominee for president has endorsed efforts to ban gay marriage in California.

Long Term Impact of Gay Sex On Society:

Lynn Wardle, a professor of law at Brigham Young University, said that legalizing same-sex marriage or civil unions endangers not only marriage as an institution but will endanger the civil rights" of those who don't approve of it.

"It's about the right to express opposition, and those who do so already suffer harassment and hostility."

He likened the consequences to the effect of divorce on children, recalling debates on the subject when he was a law school student. The notion of harm to children "was resoundingly rejected ... everybody said it's tough initially but it will be OK and there will be no lasting effects."

Yet, within a decade social scientists began documenting very distinct harm to children, he said. "There is now a large body of irrefutable evidence of the serious, harmful effects for children of divorce that have been documented."While the impact is "temporary for two-thirds, it is lifelong for about one-third," he said.

Making same-sex marriage legal "will harm you and your family the same way polygamous marriage to 14-year-olds will harm you. ... It will transform the meaning, expectations and practices of marriage as a social institution and affects everyone who has a stake in marriage.

"Legalizing such relationships would affect the functioning of the entire legal system, he said, "from taxes to torts, from wills to medical treatment. The laws will change, and we'll reconceptualize our understanding that the union of two men or two women is equally important."

Click here -http://mormontimes.com/WC_education.php?id=1880 to read the full story.

Costs Of Legalising Gay Marriage on Society:

1. Debunk common belief on opposite sex marriages, especially to teens.

2. Adverse effects on the birth rates plaguing gray nations.

3. Increased gay sexual activity in public.

4. Against moral beliefs as reinforced by various religions.

5. Wrong ideas conveyed to the generations onwards.

I have conducted a survey with Singaporeans spanning between ages 18-50.

Here's a brief questionaire:

Q1. Are you in favour of Singapore legalising Gay Sex?

YES - 33.3%

NO - 66.6%

Q2. If you are in favour, why?

They answered that they see no problem in legalising gay sex, simply because it does not affect them.

Q3. If you are not in favour, why?

They answered that they think that it'll have a negative impact on the society.

Q4. If you are not in favour, will you do something about it (e.g. Write a petition to the government)?

YES: 0%

NO: 100%

Q5. If someone wrote a petition and asks you to sign your name on it, will you?

YES: 30%

NO: 70%

Reason #1: Their names will be submitted to the government.

Reason #2: They are too lazy to do anything.

Conclusion:

Most expressed that they have no objections about the legalising of gay sex, as long as there are no public displays of "indecent" acts such as kissing.

Though it can be argued that many couples do publicly kiss, the parameters of what is deemed as "indecent" for gay couples is somewhat wider, and stricter.

"You won't want your child to see 2 guys kissing in public and have him/her questioning you about it right?", said one of my friend.

Open-minded as Singaporeans may be portrayed, there is still a certain degree of conservativeness in the society that does not allow lee-way to such matters.

THE Catfight of the Year Award: Obama VS McCain

2008-09-10T20:12:00.006+08:00

The US Race to the White House turns ugly as McCain takes a swing at Obama.

The Catfight of the Year Award - if there is ever such an award - should unarguably be awarded to the Obama and McCain campaign.

Just when almost everyone thought that McCain was muddle-headed by choosing a little-known Alaskan governor - and to add to that, the first woman to represent the Republicans - we were proven wrong.

Since Palin delivered a combative speech at the GOP Conference which drew overpowering applauses, her image has been stronger than ever. Her sex, her religion and her status as a typical average American mother have been drawing women supporters - especially those who initially supported Hillary Clinton.

Everything, basically, whether is it the dirty scandals or the rumours for Palin's lack of expertise had been cleverly turned to her advantage, and subtly covered up by her charisma.

As pointed out by Mr. Obama, she has "been receiving so much media attention..".

Mr. McCain's management had advised him to appear with Mrs. Palin all the time to boost his image. And that's what he did. He even started refering to his campaign as led by "the pair of us", when he addressed the roaring crowd with Mrs. Palin by his side.

Then let's take a look into what Obama had been doing.

Many think that Mr. Obama may be overshadowed by Mrs. Palin due to the extensive exposure to the mainstream media recently - though according to Professor Andrew White, Singapore Management of Singapore, School of Law, said that America's "mainstream media tend to favour the Democrats..", and hence resulting in the birth of FOX news, which aims to present an objective view to Americans.

Blow #1

Delivered by Mrs. Palin, who used the GOP as a platform to rail against Obama and deflect criticisms about her own lack of foreign policies, she said "What's the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick.

Obama's Response: Palin's message is like a "Lipstick on a Pig"

"We've been talking about change when we were up in the polls and when we were down in the polls," Obama said as surveys suggested John McCain and Sarah Palin have overhauled his lead for the November 4 election.

"The other side, suddenly, they're saying 'we're for change too.' Now think about it, these are the same folks that have been in charge for the last eight years," the Illinois senator told a crowd of 2,400 people in Lebanon, Virginia.

"You can put lipstick on a pig. It's still a pig. You can wrap up an old fish in a piece of paper and call it change. It's still going to stink after eight years. We've had enough," he exclaimed to a standing ovation.

Firing back, Former Republican Massachusetts governor Jane Swift said Obama was guilty of "disgraceful comments, comparing our vice presidential nominee, Governor Palin, to a pig."

Blow #2

Just last week, Mr. McCain expressed his admiration and respect for Mr. Obama - well, that was last week.

Come this week, while Mr. Obama dished out his policies on Education, the McCain campaign timely released an advertisement that mocked at Obama's sex education proposal. They claimed that Obama is aiming at giving "Comprehensive sex Education" to "kindergargeners on sex even before they can read" for that matter. The ad ended with these 3 phrases: "Obama. Wrong for Education. Wrong for your Family."

The Obama campaign retorted the McCain campaign, stating that " It is shameful and downright perverse for the McCain campaign to use a bill that was written to protect young children... Last week, John McCain told TIME Magazine that he couldn't define what honour was. Now we know why."

Though the Obama campaign swings back at the McCain campaign, many argued that it was not as spectacular or impactful as what the McCain campaign delivered in the ad.

Click here to see the video on the McCain's campaign advertisement.

Previously, Mr. McCain attacked Obama's energy plan, accused Obama of "playing the race card", said that "Obama's a celebrity, not a politician" and claimed that he "will get Osama Bin Laden" - if he was voted President.

Did the Obama campaign suffer a backlash as a result?

Let's take a look at the Polls.

Poll Statistics:

The Daily Telegraph in London

Scope of Survey: Britain, France, Italy, Germany and Russia

Period: May

Obama: 52%
McCain: 15%

All Women

August September

Obama: 50% 49%
McCain: 36% 46%

Women Under 50 (18-49 yr old)

August September

Obama: 54% 47%

McCain: 35% 49%

Analysis: Sarah Palin was both a gender and generational pick to woo voters.

Will Bring Real Change

June September

Obama: 48% 52%

McCain: 21% 35%

Analysis: Sarah Palin allowed McCain to get out of the box with the Bush-McCain relation, explaining his out-of-the-box pick of candidate. He reinvented his campaign with her help.

Dinner with Which Candidate?

Obama: 40%

Palin: 33%

McCain: 15%

Biden: 7%

- NBC News

The Sarah Palin ticket definitely brought about a huge impact as reflected in the polls to the McCain team. She has also "tripled the excitement factor", as Chuck Todd, NBC Political Commentor said.

As the countdown to Nov 4 starts getting into a dead lock, it'll be fascinating to watch Obama and Palin battle head-on, especially on the "Bridge to Nowhere" issue.

It's not YET over for Samak

2008-09-10T18:55:00.010+08:00

Thailand's Constitutional Court's verdict: Samak must step down immediately.

Thailand's Court have ruled that Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej and his Cabinet will have to resign with immediate effect as of yesterday afternoon, though the nine judges were noted to be unanimous in this decision.

PM Samak is coerced into stepping down as he was deemed to have broken Thailands's Conflict- of-Interest Law in his hosting of a cook programme on TV for about 7 years before he took office as Prime Minister.

The Court argued that Samak had received payments from the firm for hosting 'Tasting and Complaining and All Set at 6pm', despite Mr. Samak claiming that he had only received payment for providing the required ingredients and transportation fees for the cook show.

"The defendant has violated Article 267 of the constitution, and his position as prime minister has ended," said Chat Chonlaworn, the court's chief justice who headed the nine-judge panel that issued the ruling.

While 6 of the judges decided that Mr. Samak was an "employee", 3 others labelled him under the "business partner" category.

Meanwhile, this verdict was greeted by enthusiastic cheers and weeping from the PAD protestors.

Though derailed from the Parliament, it may only be a temporary setback for him as his party People's Power Party (PPP) revealed that they would consider renominating Samak for the elections this Friday for the post. Mr. Samak remains mum pertaining to questions on whether he will be accepting his party's decision, fuelling speculation amongst many.

Especially voracious for Mr. Samak to disappear from the political realm are the People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD) protestors who remained outside the government house, ready to pounce on Mr. Samak if he ever steps into the Parliament house again.

On the other hand, the ruling coalition had explicitly stated that they are currently in the midst of considering other potential candidates for the PM seat.

However, The Court ruled that Mr. Samak's party will continue to remain as caretaker administration until Parliament fills the Prime minister's post.

This implies that the senior deputy prime minister, Somchai Wongsawat, will serve as acting prime minister, who happens to be Mr. Thaksin's brother-in-law.

Seen as a proxy of the once popular Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra who got ousted in 2006 due to corruptions charges, PAD is adament in throwing Samak out of the political realm forever. PAD, which comprises of a conglomerate of royalists, urban residents and union activists, were first formed in 2006 to oust Thaksin, with peaceful demonstrations evolving into a military coup.

Mr. Thaksin is now seeking refuge in Britain, and refuses to return to Thailand, claiming that he would receive unfair treatment if he were to return.

Professional Insights:

Ji Ungpakorn, a political science lecturer at Chulalongkorn University, criticized the ruling as being out of proportion and said it aided the protesters.

"I think it is the role of judges to decide what is a serious issue, taking into account the spirit as well as the letter of the law," Ji said. "It is a minor issue being used against the government to attack it and manipulate it."

Ji said he doubted the protest alliance would voluntarily give up its struggle no matter how many of its demands are met. "They want to wreck Thai society to have their 'new order,'" he said.

Suriyasai, the alliance spokesman, told the protesters that the ruling was "proof of our legitimacy in staging the rally against the government."

"We should continue our sacred duty because it's not yet done," he added. "We would like to warn the Parliament to endorse clean and decent individuals for the new Cabinet and to be the prime minister."

Suriyasai listed almost a dozen points supported by the alliance, touching on populist and nationalist themes, including safeguarding Thailand's territory and resources, prosecuting people who insult the monarchy, and halting the privatization of state enterprises. - USA TODAY

Click here here to read the full story.

Mr. Samak currently faces a defamation suit and 3 possible corruption cases. The Election Comission has recommended that the PPP be dissolved facing vote fraud.

2100: A Waste-clouded Earth

2008-09-08T20:56:00.009+08:00

A thought suddenly dawned on me when I was in the midst of watching Wall.E today.

Aside from the absolutely adorable robot figure that dominated the movie screen, I've learnt that Wall.E stands for Waste Allocator, Lot Lifter, and the "E" goes unknown.

The show opened with a scene of Wall.E crushing heaps of waste into square cubes, then the scene progressed to a bird eye's view of an entire typical New York City.

However, glamour was not even in the picture - not even a hint of life. What I saw were tall overpowering towers that were made of cubes of waste, waste, and more waste.

That was one scary picture, but at the rate that we humans are dumping rubbish and hurting Mother Nature, it comes as no surprise if we do actually reach this stage one day where all humans find it necessary to evacuate to a new planet and invent robots to clear up Earth while we're gone enjoying life somewhere else.

One of Nature's largest dusbin:

300 and 150 million litter respectively cover the bottom of the Mediterranean and of the North sea. 60% are plastics that will last hundreds of year.

Statistical Evidence:

In the past twenty years, solid waste produced by industrial countries has tripled on a average of up to 475kg per person and per year. If the current trend remains, the global production of waste should rise by 70% by 2020. In Northern countries, which are already and by far the main waste producers, this rise could reach 200%. - www.youngreporters.org/

Key figures

A European bin contains 23% organic products (animal and vegetal), 33% paper/cardboard, 5% plastic, 8% glass, 8% metal, 3% textile, 13% various (china, dust…)

Europe counts 8700 dumps containing 1,2 billion tons of waste, producing greenhouse methane gas and contaminating ground waters (Eurostat)

On average, paper can be recycled 8 to 12 times. It is used to make more paper or cardboard. (Eco-emballages)

The entire amount of aluminium thrown per year by the USA would be enough to renew their entire fleet of commercial aircraft every three months (Worldwatch Institute)

In the wild, it takes 3 months to a paper tissue to disappear, 10 year to a tin can, 200 years to a plastic bag. (Ademe)

Recycling of 12 soft drink bottles can produce one pillow, 11 plastic bottles = one watering can, 670 cans= one bicycle, 19000 tin cans = one car. (Eco-emballages) - www.youngreporters.org/

Source: http://www.zerowasteamerica.org/Statistics.htm

A small effort goes a long way.

Do your part to save the Earth today, and remember The 3 R's: Reduce, Reuse and Recycle!

Republicans From A Different Eye

2008-09-07T14:07:00.005+08:00

This is a post-shock analysis of Sarah Palin's ticket to the White House.

"McCain is no dumb man.", said Associate Professor Andrew White, School of Law, Singapore Management University.

We shall explore why he said that and the reasons to substantiate his arguement.

All along, the media have been playing up on the scandals of Sarah Palin that appeared to be leaked out too readily, just as if someone were spoon-feeding the media with juicy news.

First it was her lack of experience that generated doubts of many Americans, then it was the news of her new born down-syndrome boy that got the people's admiration. Next it was the news of her 17-year old daughter who is reportedly 5 months pregnant. Following that is the breakout of her apparently abusing her power as the governor of Alaska with issues intertwined with her ex-sister in-law. Last but not least came the fact that her husband got involved in drink driving many years ago.

After taking in this plethora of news, I started to think that maybe Sarah Palin was the wrong choice, and like many others thought - She was chosen by McCain without much thought. But yet I felt that there must be something in Palin that McCain saw.

Today, I finally knew what it was - She is plagued with issues that any bourgeoisies (or middle Americans) will find themselves into. Money Issues, a son posted to Iraq, Teenage issues, problems tagged with raising a child - not to mention a down-syndrome child. It is difficult. And Palin's still taking it all in.

This remarkable woman had not only juggled all these throughtout the years, but had also weathered through to become a governor - so she has executive experience, as they call it. She has experience in working for the environment, and in the sector of oil (which was not mentioned at all By Prof. White).

What was mentioned and reiterated by Prof. White as a sign of emphasis is: Her values, her personality, and her believes all "resonates" with that of Mr. John McCain and that of the "middle Americans".

Thus, his argument is, because Palin IS essentially living the life of a middle American, she is hence able to comprehend and relate to the problems they face in their daily lives.

Furthermore, she has executive experience - which Obama does not have. "And Palin is ultimately running as Vice-President, but Obama clearly stated that he is running as a Presidential candidate.", said Prof. White.

Adding on to that, Prof. White also said that while "Palin complements McCain's strengths and adds value to his campaign", he does not see how Biden has added values to Obama's campaign.

I find myself agreeing, though however to only a small extent, that Palin is the right candidate because of her backgroud and how she can relate to the middle Americans. In every country, the middle class are always the bulk of the population, and often the most important to court for especially in terms of votes. Their needs are not to be neglected.

On the other hand, though Palin has given an "outstanding speech" as perceived by many during the Republicans Convention, I still have my reservations about her capabilties and the scandals trailing at her feet.

Critiques have also mentioned that with McCain at 72, he could have one feet stuck in the grave already. If the Republicans are to win the elections, and during the term Mr. McCain passes on (*Pls note that this is only a stipulated scenario), Palin would not have the capabilties to take over the post as President.

Responding to his, Prof. White only said that the fact is that "Palin is running for Vice-Presidency, and not Presidency..".

Only time will tell if she's truly capable. Of course, that is if the Republicans win the Nov 4 elections.

Meanwhile, I noticed that McCain have been using the word "CHANGE" in his campaign as well. Isn't that what Obama promised right from the start?

So, who do you find yourself agreeing with - Obama or McCain?

Insights into Samak's Position

2008-09-07T13:57:00.004+08:00

The Thailand saga has happened so swiftly that many may ask how did Mr. Samak get himself into such hot waters, and why do the people hate him so?

Here's why:

Why was Samak under fire?

#1: Samak was the first to speculate about a military coup, sending the financial markets plunging and forcing the army commander to rush out in denial.

#2: Thailand's economy is plunging and Samak has yet to produce any credible policies to address the issue.

#3: Samak's support towards the Cambodia's bid to have an ancient temple on the border with Thailand listed as a Unesco World Heritage Site sparked a nationalist backlash. - CNA

Pakistan's New President Born

2008-09-07T13:52:00.006+08:00

Latest Update:

Pakistan has elected their new President on just yesterday, Sept 6th. Though it comes as no surprise to many of us, widower of Benazir Bhotto Mr. Asif Ali Zardari has officially been entasked with the ticket to the President's seat. - CNA

It's All In One's Mindset

2008-09-06T17:15:00.009+08:00

Whenever I ask about migration, Singaporeans would always jump at the first chance to relate to me on where they would like to migrate to, and why. A typical answer would be, "Singapore's too stressful and competitive".

I admit, I used to fall under that category of people who would grab the first plane available out of Singapore. The reason why the idea of migrating is so appealing to me is simply because I want to escape - escape from all the stress I am facing in school, all the boring lectures I have to endure, and at the end of the day, be labelled as a "failure" by teachers.

However, over the years, my perception have changed. I remember excitedly telling my friend one day that I want to migrate to this country, and the kind of life I wish to live. And then he said, "Stress is everywhere across boundaries. Did you think that by just running away to another country, stress won't follow you?" It dawned on me the reality of life. And the reality of life is, yes, like my friend mentioned, "Stress is everywhere".

My parents had always taught me to climb up back from where I fell, take the stress, and carry on. Life is just like that.

Competitveness is evident in every society in every country - it just depends where or who you are to that particular society. Let me give you an example: A farmer in Australia would probably love his job (like the farmer I met when I was in Australia). Compare him to a lawmaker who's under a lot of pressure due to court cases. However, they can both be happy simply because they love their jobs! They must have came across the word "stress" more than once in their lives. Stress is part and parcel of your growing up life - be it a doctor, a teacher or even a road sweeper.

Treat it as something that pushes you to improve yourself everytime, a challenge to overcome - and before long, you'll realise you've indeed improved. And then, you can proudly look back and say, "Yes, I've done it. And I'm proud of myself."

"You may not know where you'll be in the future. But wherever you are, do your best in everything. God will watch over you." I thank God for this person who told me this.

So, to all those who made it possible for me to stand here today, who lent me a helping hand and a listening ear in times of need - to my family, Aaron, Janani, Randy, Robby, Nicholas, Jane, Riane, Gary and the many others - Thank you. For the true friendship we share.

Smile, Singaporeans!

2008-09-06T16:45:00.006+08:00

As the adage goes: "Never judge a book by its cover", I can only agree by saying "how true".

I've made a general observation on my way to school everyday as I rush into the crowded train and be prepared to be sandwiched - Singaporeans are not rude, or unfriendly, they just don't smile.

Recently, my friend was labelled as being "fierce", just as I was back in Secondary school, especially when we did not smile. "Arrogant" probably comes into the picture as well. However, after many of our friends began to know us, they realised that we weren't like that. It was all in a simple action of smiling that broke the ice.

I was often under the notion that Singaporeans are not a courteous bunch - not at all. And I always tend to compare how we're treated when I go overseas, especially to Western countries. Westerners love to help, love to interect with their neighbours, are very welcoming group of people and essentially - love to smile. Hence they are often deemed as approachable and nice. And they have shaped a community that is sharing.

So one day, I decided to put this theory to a test - If Singaporeans are truly rude or not. I tasked myself to smile to people - anyone who comes along the way, especially those who looked really fierce with their big eyes and stand-offish attitude, and those who walked with their noses up in the air.

You'll be surprised. I smiled to an old lady who seemed nonchalent about absolutely anything, a female working executive who had a sharp look and seemed to own the world, the man who distributed TODAY newspaper to me, and an old man who just needed a seat. All of their faces broke into a geuine smile, with hints of warmth in their all-so-brown eyes. Their smiles brightened up my day.

Then just another day, I saw this little girl (whom I reckon is about 9 years old) carrying her heavy school bag walking into the mrt. She was sandwiched in between many people and couldn't get to hold onto a bar. During the mrt ride, she almost fell, and I held on to her. She started searching for the hand on her bony shoulder that supported her, and when she saw my face, she simply smiled. And that smile creeped into my heart.

Just a simple action on our part can brighten someone's day.

My conclusion: Singaporeans are just like our country - Beautiful. They only need to smile to spread their love to the world.

So today, just SMILE to whoever you meet. =)

Abandon Singlish?

2008-09-05T20:55:00.004+08:00

Pertaining to the debate about Singaporeans feeling the need to speak good english, which burst into the press sometime last week, I decided to engage my friends in a discussion.

My question to them was: Do you think that there is a need for Singaporeans to speak good English? All of them agreed unanimously, citing that Singapore is a global Education Hub amongst the rest of the credentials Singapore aims to achieve or already has. In addition, Singapore have poised herself as the booming business area, managing to attract top Multinational Cooporations (MNCs) such as the Pfizer, GlaxoKlineSmith and Hewlett-Packard to set up their factories here. Naturally this would lead to a substential influx of foreign talents into the Singapore scene. Hence, speaking good english would be necessary when dealing with business partners and in your work place, especially if you happen to have an Ang-moh boss - was their verdict.

My second question then was: Do you think to inculcate that speaking-of-good-english habit in them, people should begin by speaking good english at home? Again, they agreed unanimously.

Then I continued to ask: So do you think Singlish should be abandoned by Singaporeans? Mixed reviews were given for supporting and opposing arguments, but eventually they arrived at a consenses that Singlish is part and parcel of Singaporeans, and should be seen as our culture, a unique selling point of Singapore that defines us. Hence, it should not be abandoned.

How then can we achieve a society that speaks good english?

Speaking good english has to be a conscious effort on one's part - to eliminate the 'lah's and 'lor's. It is no overnight business.

Probably in the near future, with the rate of advanced technology, Singapore would hire a top scientist specially tasked to design a machine that transforms a person - his way of talking and his vocabulary bank. So Singaporeans have only to step into the machine and out, and *poof!*, a new breed of Singaporean elites are borned - poised to take the world stage by storm.

Thailand's hurting its own people

2008-09-05T20:32:00.004+08:00

Talk about a government working for the people - fulfilling their needs, hearing their views, and working out policies to up their standard of living - Thailand appears to be doing just the opposite.

With the protest still on-going, plunging the economy into dire situation, the people into fear, and putitng a toll on the burgeousies, Thailand cannot do worse than that.

The People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD) should realise that its protests that resulted in 1 dead and many wounded so far is going nowhere, especially with PM Samak making a crystal clear stand of defiance in response to PAD's request that he step down.

Speculations were that Mr. Samak had paid a visit to the King to tender his resignation, and he was expected to announce his resignation via a radio broadcast this morning at 8:30 a.m. Singapore time. However, he caught everyone by surprise when he said in a 50-minute national radio address, "Don't even think I am going to quit..I cannot leave because under a democratic system no one group can force me to resign..", adding that this saga is a disgrace to the nation. Mr. Samak had also emphasized repeatedly that he will "stay and protect democracy and the monarchy".

So, the question boils down to: Did he actually have the King's backing? If he did, wouldn't it be better to clarify? After all, the King is held in high regard by all the Thais - not to mention the PAD, who proudly declared that they can "lay down our lives for the King".

As the King has not shown his face to clear the air, many Thais are inclined to believe that their King is threatened by Samak.

I believe that the King should, at this stage, to step forth to state his stand pertaining to the escalating situation before Thailand finds it hard to pull out of economic recession due to low investor's confidence and low consumers spending.

At this point in time, probably only the King can settle this matter with no use for the military or violence.

Gerakan take Malaysia's Politics to New Heights

2008-09-05T18:50:00.002+08:00

Amidst the escalating oil prices which eventually resulted in many Malaysians being unable to go home for Eid Al Fitr, and Anwar's promises of achieving at least 30 defectors by September 16, Gerakan has propelled the politics to new heights with a shocking statement of quitting Barisan Nasional (BN).

BN is currently led by the unpopular Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi, who have been under tremendous pressure from both his own party United Malays National Organisation (Umno) and opposition party PR led by Mr. Anwar Ibrahim.

The BN comprises of 3 main parties, namely the Umno, Gerakan and the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA).

BN saw its unprecedented failure reflected in the polls during the March 8 elections, which indicates an extremely low level of trust the Malaysians have in the current BN-led government.

Accusations against Mr. Abdullah Badawi includes abuse of power, corruption and negotiated tenders with the government mainly channelled to Umno-associated companies, hence fuelling the citizen's anger. Badawi, sad to say, has never been able to shake all these accusations off, but instead found himself sinking deeper and deeper into the mud.

Dr Lim Keng Yaik's speech today can only serve to push Mr. Badawi to the point of no return. Dr Lim is BN's former president and the most influencial voice of the party. He had openly voiced out his dissatisfactions with the party, especially its crumbling defeat during the March elections.

According to The Malaysian Insider, Dr Lim did not have high hopes of the existing and next generation of political leaders to be enlightened on the dismal situation and to bring revival to the party. He added that Umno's defeat this year is mainly due to the "worst kind of Umno arrogance as a result of the 2004 elections", businesses awarded to Umno-associated companies that were primarily decided by "the Ministry of Finance..and not the Cabinet". Dr Lim also expressed concerns over the rising prices that are no regulated, racism and how Hindraf complicated the situation by making its debut into the political arena.

Hindraf (Hindu Rights Action Force) staged government protests late last year against alleged discrimination against the ethenic-Indians. When questioned about whether Umno understood the underlying message that the citizens sent to them on March 8, Dr Lim gave a no.

However, Dr Lim appeared to be willing to grant Umno one last chance for redemption.

After digesting all the the media has willingly been feeding me with, doubts clouded my mind. Let's explore them one by one.

Firstly, why did Dr Lim only voiced out his opinion now? As Abdullah is hanging at the brink of exile from his Prime Minister's seat, is Dr Lim's speech ultimately trying to destroy him or lend him a helping hand? Is this only a ploy by BN to redeem themselves by asking a highly regarded leader to express his displeasure - which happens to coincide with what the majority of the population are thinking - then say that he is willing to grant the party one more chance? As long as the people knows that someone in power understands their point of view, and he is willing to give the party a chance, the people may follow suit. This move then woos all the supporters back to Mr. Badawi and party again.

The second scenario can be that Dr Lim has been quietly taking in all the displeasure until he decides that he can no longer tolerate silently and decides to break out of BN. However, Dr Lim holds a high position in the party. Couldn't he have done something or voiced out his opinions when he realises that Umno is travelling in the wrong direction? Why now? This is the most crucial question.

The third scenario: Dr Lim is bribed by Mr. Anwar Ibrahim. His speech is timely, especially to Anwar's promise that he will gather enough defectors by Sept 16 to topple the current coalition.

Ponder over these doubts I've raised.

And feel free to email me on any comments of your own analysis! :)

What's left of the Republicans

2008-09-03T17:40:00.005+08:00

Right before the Republicans were able to launch a counter-attack on the Obama campaign, they were smacked right in the face first.

First was the "timely" arrival of Hurrican Gustav that is raging through New Orleans like an angry old grandmother. Though Gustav have been controlling its temper between Category 1 and 2, experts say Gustav is expected to go up to Category 5, stating that it is the "Mother of all storms".

Then came Palin's dirty linens being washed in public while the Republicans are still busy being political and all-so-sympathetic about the Gustav rage. Doubts were already raised when McCain first introduced his little-known Vice Presidential candidate, sources stating that he has only met her 6 months ago, and only interviewed her once before the decision was made. Rash? "No", McCain said, defending his choice of the former Beauty Queen and Alaskan governor. He added that Mrs. Sarah Palin was "critically reviewed" and met the criteria before the decision was finalized.

However, now that news of Palin's 17-year old daughter Bristol Palin is close to five months pregnant and is unwed again threatens to topple the McCain campaign. Though Palin have stated that her daughter will be marrying the baby's father and is due to give birth in December, her lack of governence in her own household is already in a mess - as viewed by many. There are speculations, however, that Palin's 5th child is actually her daughter's.

To add oil to the fire, both Palin and her husband have been involved in police cases.

Can the Republicans survive this ordeal?

All I know is, John McCain is sharper than he looks.

Political Cartoon on the McCain Campaign

Thailand's Road to Destitute

2008-09-02T18:55:00.006+08:00

Eye-grabbing news of Thailand's political situation have been dominating the media lately. The furore began when opposition party PAD began gathering more than 200,000 protesters to date, staging a protest in front of the government house to demand the step-down of PM Samak.

During this period, PM Samak have repeatedly stated his stand that he will not step down, arguing that he had not done anything wrong and will continue to serve the nation as a Prime Minister.

A Parliamentary meeting was called 2 days ago by PAD leaders who triggered the start of the demonstration. However, the meeting was dissolved to no more than a blame game as neither parties made concession. As a result, no agreement has been reached.

While the PAD have been withering under the blazing sun day and night, they failed to realise that what they have been doing is proven to be a futile effort - and definitely not to the citizens benefit. It is contradictory, since they claim to be fighting for the rights of the citizens and the citizens affair is of their top concern. The economy is in red light as Thailand experience a high inflation and a fall in shares reflecting investor's confidence in the economy.

Even by threatening to cut the power and water supply, PAD got to think what's best for them and the people at the end of the day.

It's time to think for the people's best interests, PAD.

If there is no upturn to the situation, Thailand may very well be on its way to desitute - caused by none other than the Thais themselves.

So, what now Singapore?

2008-08-31T16:55:00.003+08:00

Since PM Lee Hsien Loong dished out attractive carrots to couples as a measure to boost the birth rate (which has been on a sharp decline), debates have been going on.

The 3 part series on Channel News Asia "Maybe a Baby?" was held just this week. Hosted by The Flying Dutchman, this forum is a platform where women and men, single and married from all walks of life air their views pertaining to the Baby issue. Issues surfaced, such as women are too career minded nowadays, and see no need in finding a partner. One night-stand suits fine, in other words. No time is another factor.

Then comes the men, who claims that Singaporean women are too focused on the 5 Cs when it comes to marriage, adding that they feel scrutinized on the first date already. The men thinks that women probably have a "checklist" to measure a guy's worth - and they don't like it. However, when asked what age would they get their life partner, most replied that the ideal age would be of a similar age, debunking the saying that men in the 30's primarily goes for women in the 20's.

So, what more has to be done to increase the birth rates?

Parents argued that they want paternal leave as well. Then Straits Times came up with a survey of men across the globe, even when given paternal leave, chooses not to use it. A simple reason is that men's earning power are generally higher than that of a women's.

Today, in the Sunday Times, Ignatious Low wrote about educating the next generation about love and sex at a younger age. His ideology is to inculcate pro-baby values and ideologies in them. If not, by the time they enter adulthood, their pre-conceived notion will be difficult to change. Well, true. Isn't that already done with all the Sex Talks and a fixed lesson a week to address issues like relationships and sex? I remember attending these kind of lessons and talks since primary school. Polytchnics now also have a module on Relationships, which saw the most number of student enrolling. When interviewed about the popularity of the course, the main reason is that the module is easy to score. But the students are attending the classes, aren't they?

Another point he brought up was to make hostel compulsory for all university students. It'll be fun, of course. But the next problem brought up by families would be the money issue. Is the government going to fund those who needs financial aids? And talk about democracy when one can't even have a choice of staying in hostels. Some people just prefer flying solo!

On the other hand, i do agree with Mr.Low that probably all schools should be made bisexual. I've had many friends who graduated from an all girls school, and after being thrown into Uni life, they just aren't used to the mere presence of the oppsite sex!

I personally feel that on top of the talks given in schools, Asian parents should be more open-minded when coming to discussing these issues with their children. Parents, besides teachers, plays a crucial role in the development of the children's life - not solely education and providing them with materialistic fulfilment. So, besides educating the children, the Government should probably start courses for parents on "How to communicate with your child about Love and Sex".

Surprise, Surprise

2008-08-31T16:36:00.004+08:00

Surprise, surprise! And that's what US Republican Presidential candidate John McCain managed to do when the news of his Vice-President choice was revealed. There were speculations, as usual, to whom he would choose. But no one, literally, expected his choice turned out to be little-known Alaskan governor Mrs. Sarah Palin.

Formerly a beauty queen, this woman is the living proof of woman's capability - both at work and at home. Just 2 years ago, she kicked out a Republican governor in the primary and a Democrat governor in the generals. She's got a love for sports which date back to her school days, passion for serving the nation, and a brain, essentially. (P.S. Beauty queens are no longer bimbo(s)!)

Apparently, according to the reports, she has been a pain in the neck to the Republican establishment - just like McCain. She resigned from the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission due to a "lack of ethics", and exposed her party's chairman for corruption.

In short, this woman is not to be trifled with. Her opening speech was full of fire, though I would like to add that the Republican's speeches in general are less capable of inspiring people than the Democrats. Call it my personal opinion, though I am not a supporter of Obama's team.

A Gallup poll released on Friday showed that Mr. Barack Obama is leading with 49 per cent compared to Mr. John McCain, who only polled 41 per cent. This is the first significant lead so far. Did McCain help Obama to the lead by appointing Palin? It's far too early to tell. But what we do know is, these polls may change after the Republican's convention.

Obama currently has the support of Former first lady and former running mate Hillary Clinton, Former President and husband of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton (who is still held in high regard by the Americans), Senator Ted Kennedy and not to mention, his wife Michelle Obama, who have won many supporters for herself lately. Big names, inarguably.

Do watch out for the Republican Convention.

To My Teachers, Thank You

2008-08-30T14:11:00.002+08:00

The moment I stepped into my ex-Secondary school today, floods of memories – both happy and sad – filled my mind. The people have changed, the decorations on the student council boards were different, but somehow I felt warm inside. The mere sight of my old school compound was heartening.

Walking up the stairs I once used often that led to the school hall, I started reminiscing on the comical things we did in school, and how I was so nervous when I first did announcements. Then there are the nerve-wreaking morning duties during the national anthem, and the days when we worked hard for our exams. Gone are those happy days.

I wasn’t having high expectations that my teachers would still remember me. After all, they have hundreds of students graduating each batch! Boy, have they proven me wrong. When I greeted them, recognition showed on their faces as they addressed me cheerfully. I was immensely touched by the simple fact that they actually remembered me.

My teachers did not expect anything in return – all they wanted is to see us have a good future. When I told them I am now pursuing my studies in mass communications, and love it, they simply smiled. Their eyes shone – with pride, with happiness, and with fulfillment.

Even though teachers are not as highly regarded now as when in the early 1970s, my teachers all had a common goal. They hoped that through their teachings, they could inspire and mould lives. The things they do everyday may be little, but it’s the little things that after accumulation, gives birth to something significant.

I am where I am today because of these noble people who felt a calling to teach – to educate, to inspire, and to touch lives. So, to Mr. Shane Kwok, Mr. James Chia, Ms. Yew, Mdm Wang, Mr. Tan Seng Huat, Ms. Jane Sue, Ms. Ismalia and to the many others who have played a part in shaping my life – Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Happy Teachers’ Day!

It's still early, Anwar.

2008-08-28T16:09:00.002+08:00

Though Anwar have created a miracle in the August 26 by-elections when he rose up or exceeded BN's expectations of winning a large margin over Barisan Nasional's (BN) candidate Mr. Arif Shah Omar Shah, it is still early as to whether he can successfully sit in Parliament for long.

Mr. Anwar Ibrahim was sworn into Parliament as a Member of Parliament (MP) today. Many will be watching as to whether he is able to deliver his promise of getting a minimum of 30 BN lawmakers on his side by September 16. This date is specially chosen as it marks the day Malaysia was born, which included Singapore when it first founded.

70 per cent of his votes have been contributed by Malays, showing a tremendous amount of support. However, doubts of his sodomy charges are still wavering in the air. Mr. Anwar will have to clear his name somehow either through the law IF he allows the police to take his DNA sample when the DNA Bill is endorsed, or by taking an swearing his innocence on Quran like his aide Mr. Azlan did. Although it looks like he currently possesses an upperhand against the government coalition, he sure has an insurmountable amount of obstacles of overcome before his political frenzy can be stabilised - and God bless, may Malaysia'a economy get back on track.

Meanwhile, as Anwar celebrates his new-found victory, PM Abdullah Badawi faces fresh calls to step down. There are signs that his political party is falling apart - this time the crack is even wider than during the March elections. A senior member of the United Malays National Organisation (Umno), Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, have expressed displeasure over the Prime Minister's capability and calls for a new leadership "to unite our people... and forge a clear national direction".

Surprisingly, ever since Mr. Anwar has been contesting in the election race, former Prime Minister Mr. Mahathir Mohammad, has kept out of the limelight - something which is uncommon of him. Mr. Mahathir has groomed and named Mr. Badawi as his successor, however after a few years under PM Mr. Badawai governance, Mahathir expressed that Badawi was not living up to expectations and called for his stepping down. Mr. Mahathir has also played a huge role in instigating senior members of Umno to pressure Badawi to resign.

Now, Mr. Mahathir's son Mukhriz, another senior Umno figure contesting to enter the party's influencial youth wing, has motioned for Mr. Abdullah's resignation.

Is Mahathir still influencing the political direction in Malaysia today, but through someone else's actions and words?

Well, for now, its good luck to both Mr. Anwar Ibrahim and Mr. Abdullah Badawi!

Hillary free her delegates & supporters

2008-08-27T17:01:00.004+08:00

A gracious move, many would say, when one sees Hillary Clinton, former First Lady and once a Democrat Presidential candidate who got beaten by Mr. Barak Obama, is now persuading her supporters to unite for a better future - support Obama.

She portrayed herself not a loser busy wallowing in self-pity, but as an elegent and a faithful Democrat, who regardless of who sits on the President chair, only hopes for a better life for the Americans. After watching her speech, I could feel the hearts of her supporters being touched by her action. Praises for her poured in. I believe she has not only brought the election race to new heights, but also inspired many more people internationally. Not to mention that even though her supporters will abide to her request to vote for Obama, this lady will never be forgotten - at least to her contributions in the American history. Sensational, that's what she is.

Clinton pledges her vote to Obama simply for the reason that Obama's pushing for the same women rights and equality for women as her. Obama similarly recognises that the fight in Iraq is doing nothing else other than having already drained US$6 billion of resources and countless lives of the American men out there. Mr. Obama has pledged to end the war in Iraq, work on healthcare policies for the 47 million Americans who still do not have one, drive towards Clean Energy Policy amidst other plans.

Hillary also refered to the Obama team as a "strong team", adding that Mr. Joe Biden is "pragmatic, tough and wise", complimenting Obama perfectly. Democrats are optimistic of the outlook for the Presidential Race at this point in time.

Hillary went on to criticise McCain, saying that even though he is her personal friend, but if he thinks that "47 million Americans without healthcare is normal, and that the economy at this time is fundamentally sound...John McCain and George Bush are inseparable.". In her speech, she had repeatedly stated that the Americans "don't need another 4 years of the Bush administration", after 8 years of Bush. During these 8 years, USA chalked up its "biggest deficit in the American history", launched wars on Iraq and Afghanistan, seen a serious brain-drain out of America, and had "eroded" US's standing worldwide.

Present at the speech with her were her husband Mr. Bill Clinton and daughter.

"Barak Obama is my candidate.."

"No way. No how. No McCain."

Well, she not only drew applause from her audiences live, but found myself applauding for her in my heart when watching the video.

If you want to catch it, you may go to MSNBC.

Anwar's Triumphant Victory

2008-08-26T20:53:00.008+08:00

Latest Update from CNA News:

The Malaysian ruling coalition bows out of the government as they concede defeat to Mr. Anwar Ibrahim. He enjoyed an easy victory for the by-election in Permatang Pauh, garnering a majority of 31,195 votes that propelled him into the MP seat.

This number is substantially morecompared to the 13,388 votes Mr. Anwar's wife, Dr. Wan Azizah won before she graced into the Parliament in 1998. She had voluntarily vacated the seat for her husband to run in the elections this year.

BN's number of votes was 15,671 trailing that of Anwar's.

Good Choice, Obama!

2008-08-26T14:47:00.004+08:00

After suffering a crushing defeat from rival John McCain at the Christian Conference with Guest Pastor Rick Warren anchoring the show, Obama wasted no time in delivering a punch back. That is achieved beautifully with the help of newly enlisted Vice-President choice Joe Bidden.

His debut appearance was an attack on the McCaim camp which earned points from the Obama supporters. Joe Bidden, who has many years of experience in foreign policies and a strong trail of working-class supporters is the perfect man for Obama. He has Obama's back on foreign matters. In addition, the working-class supporters garnered would definitely be a boost to Mr. Obama's votes in Ohio, Michigan and other Rust Belt states.

Mr. Biden has proposed a resolution to be reached for the Iraq war to President George Bush after the Sept 11 attacks, and only said that mobilizing the troops would be a last resort. This is probably partly why Biden was chosen - no outfront support for the Iraq war. Hence, in favour with the Americans. That was probably partly why Hillary Clinton lost out to Obama. Not only did she represent a figure of the old politics (unlike a CHANGE promised by Obama), she supported the Iraq war at that point in time. Bummer!

Most importantly, Mr. Biden's a Roman Christian. Another bonus.

However, many things can happen from between now till November 4.

The US Elections is only going to get more intense. So, grab on tight everyone, lest you fall off the roller coaster ride!

What is the truth, Malaysia?

2008-08-26T13:25:00.002+08:00

Many fence-sitters wavering would probably have decided on supporting Anwar now. Politicians and political analysts have expressed that Anwar is expected to win easily.

This came only after a twist in the sodomy allegations against Anwar was surfaced on Sunday night. A Muslim cleric, who witnessed Mr. Saiful Bukhari Azlan taking his oath at the Federal Territory Mosque, claimed that the oath had not been properly conducted. He had also subtly hinted that he did not believe Mr. Saiful as he thought it was a political conspiracy.

According to a survey conducted in Permatang Pauh, only an approximate 169 out of 544 Malay voters believed Mr. Saiful's oath.

However, I can't help but question the timely arrival of this alarming news, just like that of Mr. Saiful's oath which occured on August 16 - the eve of Mr. Anwar filing the nomination document. The accusation by Mr. Saiful at that time was tantamount to having Anwar saying good-bye to his new-found political freedom shortly after he was barred from entering politics for 10 years since 1998.

So, why is no one raising eye-brows on this fresh declaration? In my opinion, the impact of this prominent news came at such a close timing to the election date that is even more powerful than that of Mr. Saiful's oath. It alarmed Malaysians, naturally swaying their votes to Anwar. However, there are only about 2 days left to the election date, leaving a bewildered Barisan Nasional (BN) who can only stare and see the victory go to PR.

BN's strategy? Mr. Arif Shah Omar Shah played the sympathy card. Holding up a police report and showing the hoax SMS he received in a press conference, he claims that he is the "poorest candidate in this race", and added that his duty is to "provide service to his constituents". The SMS stated that people could collect payment from him for the by-election.

It is possible that PR is the one behind all these drama occurring. They could have sent a hoax SMS, put BN under fire for a possible bribery charge. Then tip off a witness to reverse the suspicions pertaining to Mr. Saiful's oath. Or maybe the SMS hoax was staged by BN themselves. Then again, it may just be what we see on the surface - its just purely a prank by anyone.

One thing I've learnt about politics: It's never simple.

Pakistan Latest Update

2008-08-26T06:44:00.003+08:00

Lastest Update: Ex-PM Nawaz has decided to quit the coalition over dispute of the reinstatement of the lawmakers Musharraf sacked.

What's next for Pakistan?

2008-08-25T20:40:00.002+08:00

Pakistan ex-President Pervez Musharraf have been pressured into resigning from his post last Monday, 18th August 2008, to avoid impeachment charges. The charge is unprecedented for a President. Now, the question is: What lies ahead for the terrorist dominant country?

Mr. Musharraf have always been a close US ally - or bluntly put - a US watchdog. However, it is probably thanks to the US control over Pakistan and the aid of US's navy that has helped in establishing that little bit of political and economic stability.

The opposition parties united to oust Mr. Musharraf. However, after he stepped down, many speculated that the opposition parties would fall apart due to their differences.

Well, not the case - at least up till now. Former Pakistani Premier Nawaz Sharif has made it clear that he would accept arch-rival Ali Zadari to be the next President. His condition: Whoever who "abolishes the 17th Amendment" and reinstate the lawmakers fired by ex-President Musharraf will the next nominated President. An official agreement has been signed.

Mr. Nawaz, who heads the Muslim league-Nawaz (PM-L) has also slashed the deadline of Wednesday by 2 days.

Mr Zardari, widower of assasinated former premier Benazir Bhutto, had won backing from his Pakistan People's Party (PPP) across the board last Friday, 22 August.

He will be running for his Presidential post this Friday, 29 August 2008.

Rise Up, Prayer Warriors!

2008-08-25T20:21:00.003+08:00

To all the Christians who happens to be reading this message:

Pray for the Jews in Georgia.

Since 1989, over 23,000 Jews have fled to Georgia to seek refuge. There are approximately 12,000 Jews in Georgia caught in a dilemma. 90 percent of those Jews are currently living in the city of Tiblisi, the capital of Georgia. That is where the Russian troops are situated. Even though a consensus have been established and President of Russia Dmitri Medvedev have agreed to a troop withdrawal, many troops still remain in Georgia.

The Jews are in a life-threatening situation right now.

Please keep them in your prayers.

Malaysian Race to August 26, 2008

2008-08-25T19:55:00.004+08:00

I must say, the 2008 Malaysian Elections is really a must-watch. Forget your Channel 5's Must-see-Tuesday. Instead, switch your channel to "Wrestlers: Anwar VS Arif Shah Omar Shah". This is better than W.W.E.

The Malaysian Elections have been dominating headlines day after day since the announcement of Mr. Anwar Ibrahim contesting for a seat in the Parliament. After suffering countless personal attacks on his past sodomy charges from both Mahathir (ex-Prime Minister) and Barisan Nasional (BN), the elections have been pushed to new heights. The escalating heat, the rising worries of the citizens. Boy, is it stressful for the Malaysian denizens right now. I'm in Singapore, and I can feel the anxieties of the PKR and BN.

The elections reached a climax when one of Mr. Anwar's aide, Mr Saiful, took an oath in a mosque and sweared on Quran that he was sodomised by Mr. Anwar. He even challenged Mr. Anwar to do the same to prove his innocence. Mr. Anwar was quick to reply as well, saying that he was "forbidden" by Islamic religious teachers to take an oath on the Quran.

Now, Penang has declared tomorrow a public holiday so that citizens can cast their votes for PKR's candidate Anwar. Previously, it was suspected that the Election Commission who set the Election date on a Tuesday supports the BN, and hopes that this move would discourage Anwar voters from voting.

Tomorrow is the long-awaited day.

I just hope that all this would end soon. After all, at the end of the day, the citizens are the ones who suffer the most (economically, socially etc.).

Say HELLO to Democratic China!

2008-08-25T19:34:00.003+08:00

The Beijing Olympics yesterday ended with a spectacular BANG! The splendor of fireworks, the voracious crowd in the Bird Nest, and the magnificent cheography of performance which can be credited to Zhang Yimou - beautiful.

However, beneath all that glory set my mind reeling on what China had so efficiently swept under their carpet - the politics. During this 2 weeks everyone was so caught up in the Olympic Games that one probably has placed the Tibetan Issue at the back of their minds - thrown into a folder called "Outdated Affairs". No, it is not. To be brutally honest, if several protesters have not caused a motion at the Beijing stadium, I would have displaced this issue into that memory folder of mine too. So, I must really say, "Job well done!", to the China officials.

The Chinese government came up with a brilliant strategy: To allow protesters to carry out their protest activities at designated places in China. BUT here's the condition: One must apply for a protester permit before one is being allowed to carry out their activities there. So, exactly how many permits are being issued till this point in time, you may ask. Well, the figures remains unknown, but for all we know, its a perfect zero. Let's wait to see.

In the meantime, it'll be interesting to see how China faces this issue after the Beijing Olympics 2008.

'STOP AT TWO' POLICY- ST 24/08/08

2008-08-24T17:44:00.002+08:00

As many would have correctly pointed out, the measure was unarguably too successful. And in this case, it has a negative impact on the decades ahead since 1972 when the Family Planning and Population Board launched the policy. The reason: the advertisements and posters have not only sent the message out to those who are setting up a family in the 1970s, but also to their offspring.

My mother was ten at that time, but she remembers the message until now. She’s in her late forties now. Imagine the impact. The decision to have two children, she admitted, have been more or less been affected by the policy. The idea of a small and manageable family of four became the iconic ideal family deeply entrenched in their minds. What left the deepest impression on her mind is the poster of a Family Planning advertisement, showing a family of four under one roof.

Gradually, due to the economy pick-up in Singapore, Singaporeans are becoming more affluent and enjoying a higher standard of living. Then comes the birth of career women who are to a certain extent influenced by the western ideologies. This led to a breakthrough in the younger generation as they embrace the new ideologies and began reshaping Singapore’s workforce. That saw the influx of more women entering the workforce, the rise of a conglomerate of women coming together to fight for their rights and unavoidably, the plunging birth rates.

As for me, my ideal family would be having two children as well – one boy and one girl. A balanced and manageable family, in my thinking. Probably because in my generation I have already been living in the comfort zones of my living room, and not running around in kampong with a big group of friends playing marbles. The Singapore today is vastly different from the past where Singaporeans live together, and hear (literally) everything from marriage squabbles to what your neighbour’s cooking for dinner. A big community living together, that is. We younger generations are just not accustomed to it. Rowdy is just not my thing.

CITIZEN GONG LI - ST 24/08/08

2008-08-24T17:37:00.001+08:00

Gong Li is our fellow Singaporean now – is it a mere rumor or a fact? However, regardless of the truth behind this fact, her image has already been played up by the mainstream media at the infiltration of, may I stress again, a mere rumor at this stage.

I believe that many Singaporeans would welcome Gong Li with open arms. I mean, rebut me, but what’s there not to like about the highly credited Asian beauty? To be frank, I’ve heard her name since I was of a very young age. The pride of the Asians would definitely go to Gong Li without any hints of debate – that’s of course if my parents were the judges, and if there was such an award. The culmination of Gong Li’s career credentials is not one that many in the world can beat in the aspect of fame and riches in the entertainment industry in Asia.

Gong Li’s entrance would be of one that propels Singapore’s name further across the globe, boosting our reputation. Increased media attention internationally is an understatement. Her reasons for applying to become a citizen of Singapore would be highly watched, and probably shared by others. Her entry may well bring more tourists and an influx of foreign talents into Singapore. A big plus would be her fat, enticing paycheck. Not only will Singapore have an addition to the list of billionaires, but also a boost to the nation’s revenue via tax collection. Its good-bye recession, and hello bonuses.

However, will China bear to forgo such a gold nugget? What will then be China’s response on this issue? Her glory would be difficult to establish or give credit to either countries. Diplomatic ties between Singapore and China must be managed well.

I am in favor that Gong Li takes up Singapore’s citizenship, but all said and done, the main crux of the issue remains, is that “Gong Li” the “Gong Li’ that we’ve all been referring to.